TF Info Page for EN2 (Homeodomain)

Conclusion

Assessment Binding Mode Motif Status Notes Comments
Known motif 1 Monomer or homomultimer High-throughput in vitro

Description

Description: engrailed homeobox 2 [Source:HGNC Symbol;Acc:HGNC:3343]
Entrez Summary Homeobox-containing genes are thought to have a role in controlling development. In Drosophila, the 'engrailed' (en) gene plays an important role during development in segmentation, where it is required for the formation of posterior compartments. Different mutations in the mouse homologs, En1 and En2, produced different developmental defects that frequently are lethal. The human engrailed homologs 1 and 2 encode homeodomain-containing proteins and have been implicated in the control of pattern formation during development of the central nervous system. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Ensembl ID: ENSG00000164778
External Link: CisBP
Interpro IPR000747; IPR001356; IPR009057; IPR017970; IPR019549; IPR019737; IPR020479; ;
Protein Domain: ENSP00000297375
Domain:
Protein: ENSP00000297375DBD: HomeodomainOther: Engrail_1_C_sig

Previous Annotations

Source Annotation
TF-CAT classification TF Gene_Transcription Factor Binding
tf co-factor binding
DNA-Binding
sequence-specific_Co-activation_
PMIDS:9813123
Vaquerizas 2009 TF classification
"a" Has direct evidence of TF function;
"b" Has evidence for an orthologous TF;
"c" contains likely DBDs, but has no functional evidence;
"x" is an unlikely TF such as predicted gene, genes with likely non-specific DBDs or that have function outside transcription;
"other" category contains proteins without clear DBDs they curated from external sources.
b
CisBP considers it as a TF? Yes
TFclass considers it as a TF? Yes
Has GO:0003700 "transcription factor activity, sequence-specific DNA binding" No
GO-Info
Initial Assessment
1a1 Protein has a high confidence PWM (HT-SELEX, PBM or B1H model) or there is a crystal structure that supports sequence specific DNA binding;
1a2 There is high confidence data for a close ortholog (as defined in CisBP);
2a1 There is lower confidence direct evidence, such as a Jaspar, Hocomoco or Transfac model;
2a2 There is lower confidence evidence for an close ortholog;
3a There is decent circumstantial evidence for its role as a TF or not;
4a Two or more datasets predict it as a TF;
5a One of the source datasets predicts is as a TF
1a1, Direct HQ evidence
TF has conditional DNA-binding requirements

DNA-Binding

Published Motif Data

Source Annotation Motif Evidence
HT-SELEXJolma2013Direct
HT-SELEXJolma2013Direct
HT-SELEXYin2017Direct
Methyl-HT-SELEXYin2017Direct
Methyl-HT-SELEXYin2017Direct
PBMBerger08Inferred - En2 (100% AA Identity, Mus musculus)
SMiLE-seqIsakova2017Inferred - EN1 (94% AA Identity, Homo sapiens)
HT-SELEXYin2017Inferred - EN1 (94% AA Identity, Homo sapiens)
Methyl-HT-SELEXYin2017Inferred - EN1 (94% AA Identity, Homo sapiens)
Methyl-HT-SELEXYin2017Inferred - EN1 (94% AA Identity, Homo sapiens)
PBMBerger08Inferred - En1 (94% AA Identity, Mus musculus)
SELEXJASPARInferred - EN1 (94% AA Identity, Homo sapiens)
TransfacTransfacLicense requiredInferred - EN1 (94% AA Identity, Homo sapiens)
B1HJASPARInferred - en (78% AA Identity, Drosophila melanogaster)
HT-SELEXNitta2015Inferred - en (78% AA Identity, Drosophila melanogaster)
TransfacTransfacLicense requiredInferred - en (78% AA Identity, Drosophila melanogaster)
MisciDMMPMMInferred - en (78% AA Identity, Drosophila melanogaster)
B1HJASPARInferred - inv (75% AA Identity, Drosophila melanogaster)

Structure

Structure PDB Not_Covered

Experimental History

Method Constructs
Tried in PBM?
(Whether the protein was tried in PBM or not)
Tried in HT-SELEX
(Whether the protein was tried in HT-SELEX or not, and if so, then what kind of clones were tested)
Other Information?
(Tried with another method and failed?)

External Contribution